Any slave granting a Master services rather than obeying is a servant, not a slave. Slaves do not grant services, they obey. Any Master who has found a man who “slaves” for him, who calls him “Master” and runs around serving him all day, is not a Master, but merely a recipient of voluntary services. Masters do not simply receive, they give commands.
suddenurge2 liked this
newtothislife07 liked this
mrwsp reblogged this from erospainter
alwaysleftwanting reblogged this from erospainter
dizmoo liked this
itsjustarnold liked this
panza1 liked this
cpmiv liked this
newbienurs liked this
ravenouslife liked this
blacksigismund liked this
blacksigismund reblogged this from erospainter
1hot2trotmamma liked this
manocali reblogged this from erospainter
manocali liked this
whiterabbit0117 said:
I could not disagree more. A man tied to micromanaging a slave with every command is not a master but a slave to the servant. A master who has trained his slave to serve and meet his needs as the master desires is the true master.
newro liked this
sensualove reblogged this from erospainter
troublingtemptations reblogged this from erospainter and added:
distinct difference.
sassyfrassylassy liked this
rjslk reblogged this from erospainter and added:
mastering Mastery!
rjslk liked this
lnlytxgrrl reblogged this from erospainter
ella9 liked this
erospainter posted this
